Article Directory
Monad's Big Launch: Same Old Crypto Song and Dance, or Is This One Different?
Alright, folks, gather 'round. Another Monday, another "revolutionary" crypto mainnet launch. This time, it's Monad, the supposed Solana-killer with Ethereum's soul, or whatever marketing jargon they're peddling this week. The monad mainnet officially went live on November 24, 2025, and if you blinked, you might've missed the initial fanfare before the inevitable price shenanigans started.
Let's be real, the crypto world ain't exactly a stranger to grand entrances followed by a quick reality check, and this one felt... well, 'underwhelming' isn't quite right. It felt predictable.
The Hype Machine Grinds On
First up, the big showstopper: Coinbase's inaugural token sale for the MON token. They pulled in a whopping $269 million in commitments from nearly 86,000 participants across 70-plus countries. One point four three times oversubscribed, they crowed. Impressive numbers, sure, if you're into that sort of thing. It’s like watching a packed stadium for a band that only plays covers – lots of energy, but is anyone actually creating anything new?
Coinbase even ran internal polls, claiming most participants were in it for "long-term exposure" rather than "short-term speculation." Give me a break. You expect me to believe 86,000 people, fresh off a public sale, are all just gonna sit there and patiently wait for years? Come on. That’s like saying everyone at a blackjack table is just there to admire the felt. We all know the game, don't we? People want to make a quick buck, and who can blame 'em when the insiders are practically printing money?
The Monad co-founder, Keone Hon, tried to spin the 85,000 participants as the "most important statistic," talking about distributing MON to millions and expanding crypto beyond existing communities. Noble, I guess. But if your goal is truly broad distribution, why does the tokenomics chart look like a treasure map for a select few? It’s a nice sentiment, but my cynical antennae are practically vibrating offcourse my head. What happens when those "millions" realize they're holding bags while early investors are popping champagne?
The Numbers Don't Lie... Or Do They?
Now, for the part everyone actually cares about: the monad price. The MON token started around $0.025 in the sale, jumped to $0.0365 by Monday afternoon – a 46% increase, nice for those who got in early. But then, almost on cue, it stumbled. A 15% fall from $0.026 to $0.023 shortly after the mainnet launch itself. Classic. It dipped, it pumped, it dumped a little. The 24-hour trading volume hit $450 million, with a market cap around $394 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $3.6 billion. Big numbers, but what does it mean when the price is already doing the cha-cha?
Here's where the real stink starts to rise. Pseudonymous analyst CoinMamba, bless his honest heart on X, pointed out what a lot of us were already thinking: the tokenomics. Twenty-seven percent for the team? That's unusually high, folks. Twenty percent for VCs, likely at prices lower than what retail investors paid? And 38.5% for "Ecosystem Development," which is often a fancy term for "we'll figure it out later, but we control it for now."
So, you've got nearly 50% of the initial circulating supply (10.8% of total supply) out there, with a big chunk from the public sale and an airdrop distribution coinciding with the launch. That airdrop, by the way, just screams "sell-side pressure." It's like handing out free beer at a concert, knowing damn well half the crowd's gonna try to flip it for a profit. The market goes into a "price discovery phase," which is just a polite way of saying "things are about to get wild, and not in a good way for everyone."
I'm picturing some poor retail investor, hunched over his laptop in a dimly lit room, multiple monitors glaring, watching the MON chart tick by, hoping his few grand doesn't evaporate while the big boys are already cashing out. It’s a familiar scene, isn't it? Who are these "ecosystem development" tokens really developing for, anyway? And why are the team and VCs so heavily incentivized to hold, while the little guy gets to participate in the "discovery" phase?
The Promises vs. Reality Check
Monad's pitch is slick, I'll give 'em that. A layer-1 blockchain founded in 2022, raised $225 million, aiming to build an EVM-compatible network that rivals Solana's speed and Ethereum's decentralization. Ten thousand transactions per second, 0.4-second block times, 800ms finality, near-zero gas fees. Sounds like the holy grail, doesn't it? Heard that one before. Every new chain promises the moon, but very few actually deliver more than a handful of craters.
They say 50.6% of the total 100 billion MON token supply is locked up, with vesting not even starting until the second half of 2026 and going through 2029. That's a long, long leash for the team and early investors. They're gonna hold onto those bags for years, while you... well, you do you. The Monad Foundation will "steward" the ecosystem tokens. Sounds official, sounds grand, but it still means a centralized entity is holding a massive amount of power over the token's future.
Coinbase, bless their hearts, plans to host approximately one token sale a month through this new platform. It's a smart move for them, acquiring Echo and Sonar crowdfunding platforms to become the new crypto kingmakers. But for us, the audience, it just means a steady stream of new tokens, new hype cycles, and new opportunities for the same old story to play out. Then again, maybe I'm just a jaded old cynic who can't see the next big thing... Nah. Probably not.